Blog

  • Won’t Someone Think of the Trees?!

    Since I live in close proximity to the District of Columbia, I frequently find myself in the city for one reason or another. Sometimes it’s to have lunch with a friend, attend a hockey game or some other gathering. Whatever the reason, I tend to try to find other things to do as long as I’m there.

    That frequently involves hitting up a few museums, and though I’ve been to just about all of the major ones there’s usually a new exhibit or something to check out. But yesterday I was just walking on the Mall when I came across a curious situation.

    For months preparations have been underway for President-elect Barack Obama’s inauguration and the festivities that go along with it. So it was no surprise to see lots of plywood, trucks and workers along Pennsylvania Avenue just in front of the White House.

    But I didn’t expect to see a team of men apparently tasked with protecting trees from the rowdy masses ready to descend on a cold January day. Here’s a look at a line of trees that extend for several blocks. The guys were rolling down the street with this flatbed truck, a closer look here, slapping up beautiful plywood boxes around each of the trees.

    When they’re done, they look like this. If you’ll recall from the first photo, they have small metal edgings to begin with. You can still see them here, despite the fortress that has been installed.

    One of the big questions: how many trees did we cut down for the plywood that’s protecting these trees? Plus, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, we sort of have a financial crisis on our hands. How much are taxpayers shelling out for the manpower and materials to construct the tree boxes? I have just enough free time to give half an effort to email some people and pretend they’ll get back to me on such important questions.

    December 19, 2008 Uncategorized
  • Best Blog in the House

    Thanks to the fine folks at the Susquehanna University bookstore, I once purchased a bag of books for $0.50 a piece.

    Some of them were promising steals at clearance prices. Others were of the “why the heck not, they’re 50 cents” kinds of purchases. In the end, only one of them has been even slightly worth my time. It’s not “The Columnist,” which was one of the abysmal literary endeavors of my life.

    Spike Lee’s “Best Seat In The House” is the one that makes the cut, though I’m pretty sure having the late Ralph Wiley involved was instrumental in the experience. It’s a basketball memoir of his life as a Knicks fan. The book covers the Knicks from his early childhood until roughly 1997. That timeline, read 10 years later, is somewhat interesting to look back on based on his comments about certain players and teams.

    Penny Hardaway? Oh, there was a time he was supposed to be good. Juwan Howard, Chris Webber and Rod Strickland? Apparently they had promise for the Washington Wizards nee Bullets. Oh well.

    There’s only one anecdote I feel the need to pass on. When he was a kid, Spike used to ride his bike from Brooklyn into Manhattan with his brothers and some friends. On one such trip, his brother Chris’ bike gets a flat. Not wanting to walk the thing alllllll the way back home, Chris picks it up and throws it into the East River.

    There’s more than just straight basketball talk here. Spike brings in the chronology of his films to bring out certain points about the atmosphere surrounding sports and the country’s cultural status. It’s an effective way to mix worlds and widen the perspective of an otherwise possibly restrictive read.

    It’s also number 18 on the list. Now onto John Kennedy Toole’s “A Confederacy of Dunces”

    December 9, 2008 books Susquehanna Uncategorized
  • Youth of Copper Crossing

    Shortly before the election I wrote about a kid I saw eating grass. I said the future of American surely can’t be that bright, especially since the grass was right next to where thousands of horses have surely done their business.

    That incident took place .76 miles from my house in the illustrious Copper Crossing neighborhood. Today there was another sign of a dismal future, but this time it hit much closer–a mere .14 miles away.

    A young boy was walking home from school as I drove by. Because he was walking, I can only surmise he attends Floris Elementary. In its heyday, Floris injected knowledge into such brilliant minds as my own and those of the students who also happened to go there. I was also a walker, which at the time I thought made me somehow special.

    But I don’t want to get too off track here. The kid was toting two items on his walk home: a jacket of some sort and one of those newfangled “backpacks” that looks more like a piece of small luggage more suited for rolling down the hallways of nearby Dulles International Airport.

    Now back in my day, we just carried regular backpacks during the arduous journey home. Sometimes we rocked two straps, sometimes just one, depending on what was cool at the time. But I’ll even let the kid have a pass for being lazy. However, I will not let him off for dragging the thing sideways, one step at a time, instead of using the built-in wheels.

    That’s right. The kid could easily have been walking at an easy pace with the “backpack” rolling cheerily along behind him. Instead, he was struggling one step at a time, heaving the thing along on its side.

    Fear for the future. Actually that reminds me of the movie “Idiocracy,” which many will tell you sucks but yet I think is beyond awesome. Yesterday I was flipping through a catalog and saw this. If you haven’t seen the movie, Brawndo is a Gatorade-like substance that Americans have been convinced is an absolute replacement for water–suitable for watering plants despite the obvious evidence that all the plants are dead. It’s got what plants need!!!

    I also got two DVDs from Netflix today that both have the exact same runtime. Must be a sign of some sort.

    December 4, 2008 kids Uncategorized
  • 2+2=5

    George Orwell’s “1984” is a book I’m pretty sure that most people have tackled at some point in their life. For me, this was my second time.

    The first was the summer before my senior year in high school, which is now a whopping 8 years in the past. As I read I didn’t remember much from that first encounter. Actually, only two things stand out and really neither has much to do with the plot or themes.

    One is how almost useless it felt for me to read the book at the time. That’s not to say it wasn’t a good read or that I didn’t enjoy the act itself. Rather, in an academic sense it made absolutely no difference.

    My sophomore and junior years at the illustrious Oakton High School I was enrolled in advanced English classes. That meant that not only did I have to do more summer reading than the “regular” class, but it also required papers and discussions on each one. Senior year I decided to take the English side a bit easier since I was taking on AP Calculus and AP Government.

    That turned out to be a great decision for my sleep schedule. On the first day of class we were given a writing assignment. It was some sort of college essay that was roughly two pages. And it was due by Thanksgiving. I should have started bringing a pillow to class. No mention of “1984” whatsoever. None. The period itself was divided–half hour of class, then lunch, then the last hour of class. That meant that any quiz or graded item was done before lunch and I spent the hour conked out on my desk. I can’t imagine what would have happened had I stayed awake the whole time. Though I’m not sure I could have improved on my roughly 105% average in the class. That’s probably also the reason the teacher never bothered to wake me up.

    I remember sitting on our front porch to read a good portion of the book. The other distinct memory is the image I had of the main female character, Julia. One of the sometimes jarring things about watching a movie version after you have read a book is how different the actor is from what you had pictured while reading. For me, Julia was Britney Spears from a video that I will now look up online because I’m happy to say I don’t know the name of it.

    Hold please.

    Ok I’m back. It was the video for “Oops I Did It Again.” I think Britney became my Julia because that video was on TV that summer, and Orwell describes her as having some sort of jumpsuit type attire. If only he had predicted K-Fed’s influence and the emergence of Trainwreck Britney.

    Actually, I’m going to argue that he did. These two people who work for the same basic entity end up in a pretty inexplicable relationship. It’s wrong on many levels and yet they become intimate very quickly. They are eventually exposed and beaten down both physically and mentally by guards and drugs. They emerge with a relationship that will never be the same, and neither looks remotely the same.

    Maybe Orwell was the original TMZ.

    November 26, 2008 books Uncategorized
  • Mmmmm…Ice Cream…

    It’s slightly possible that I have too much time on my hands. Actually, they may have been the case for a long time.

    As evidenced by this 2006 entry, sometimes I find a spot in my schedule to email a large corporation about a slightly less-than-egregious wrong on their part. In the former case, it was my beloved Taco Bell that failed to give my friend the correct sauce for his meal several trips in a row.

    Now, it’s the ice cream standards at Harris Teeter.

    Let my message to their online comment system explain the situation:

    “Dear Harris Teeter Persons,

    I recently purchased some Harris Teeter All Natural Ice Cream labeled as containing ‘Vanilla Fudge Swirl.’ Upon opening the container, I was surprised at how little of the fudge portion was present. Is there a set percentage at which you can call a product ‘Vanilla Fudge Swirl?’ I expected a consistent thick ribbon as shown on the front of the carton. Please advise.”

    To more completely understand the outlandish nature of labeling this ice cream as “Vanilla Fudge Swirl” I offer the following pictures: The box, and its contents.

    Unfortunately, the fine people at the Harris Teeter customer service department didn’t quite take the bait in an extremely entertaining way as I had hoped. Instead they apologized for the problems I was having with their product and said I could return it with a receipt for a replacement.

    I guess we’ll never know what level of fudge is required to call something “Vanilla Fudge Swirl.”

    November 24, 2008 Taco Bell Uncategorized
  • Fork Carefully

    If you’re driving at night, it’s generally a good idea to have your headlights on. But once you arrive at a destination it’s an equally good idea to turn them off. Otherwise bored people such as myself may take a picture of your illuminated front end and write about it on the internets.

    I got the call around 10 p.m. A friend was going to be stranded at a metro station due to a slight lack of forethought in planning his day. No matter. Like the heroic George Costanza going to pick up Jerry Seinfeld at the airport, I was up for the job.

    I arrive at the Vienna station’s parking lot a few minutes before the train arrives. There are a few other cars there, but none are occupied. While I wait, four cars arrive in my area of the lot. Despite being a somewhat lit area, and the fact that the vehicles are not moving, three of the four cars keep their headlights on for at least the 10 minutes I was there.

    I thought maybe I was not giving them the benefit of the doubt and they may just not have noticed the lights were on. But one was parked directly across from me, as seen in this cell phone photo. It’s not like we were in a barren field illuminated by floodlights. It was somewhat light by a few lights, but still dark enough you should see the extra bright parking meter, bus stop shed dealio or certainly the car across from you as some dude took your picture.

    It could have also been a way they thought they could more easily spot their passenger for pickup. But in mine and the two other cases I saw, the drivers typically spotted their cargo long before they reached the lot and drove up to meet them.

    Perhaps the best explanation was an attempted summoning of some sort of mother ship. Had I turned on my lights, we may have made an incredible breakthrough in contacting and attracting other life forms to our planet. Sorry. I didn’t get the Facebook invitation to the event.

    But remember, always fork carefully.

    November 19, 2008 metro Uncategorized
  • Blog of Illusions

    I’m a big fan of movies like “Snatch” that bring together several parallel storylines for a satisfying conclusion. Paul Auster’s novel “The Book of Illusions” is a masterful literary example.

    I almost want to say nothing for the fact that I can’t begin to express how much I enjoyed this book. You can find just about anyone to give a good review of anything, as evidenced by the strange publications cited as calling “Alvin & The Chipmunks” one of the best movies of the year. In book terms, they go for some variation of “page-turner” like “Just try and put it down!”

    But in this case, it wasn’t that I couldn’t put it down, but was so engrossed in the story I’d reel off 40 pages, 60 pages, feeling like I had been reading for five minutes. It’s like sleeping in the car on a long trip, once you get started you can’t believe how quickly it went by. And what goes by is a great weaving of people’s lives that end up reflecting and following one another in such a way that you want to draw conclusions about their relationship. It’s the first book this year that I’m dead sure I will go back and read again, carefully noting parts that seemed insignificant in the beginning that will have a different look knowing the outcome.

    In the movies, the storylines always come together in a very tangible way. The groups come together, or one party’s scheme ends up affecting someone they have never met but whom we have been following on screen. Auster gives another level, adding the literary sense of the reader connecting themes and motifs that don’t necessarily play out in the direct action.

    One of the reviews on the back cover calls the book “gripping and immensely satisfying.” I concur.

    So that’s 16. I think 20 is in reach.

    November 19, 2008 books Uncategorized
  • Be Good

    Sometimes I surprise even myself. Yesterday I posted saying it would be a day or two before I got to writing about Number 15 on the list, really thinking it would be more like four days.

    But here I am one fine day later. I would blame the expedited finishing of Nick Hornby’s “How To Be Good” on going to the DMV today, except it was easily the fastest DMV trip in the history of humanity and I only read like four pages there.

    This was sort of a recommendation, which have turned out to be some of my favorite books in the Year of Reading or whatever I dubbed this project in January. Actually “High Fidelity” was the recommendation, but since I’ve seen the movie I thought I’d give this one a shot.

    “How To Be Good” puts forth a very simple question: What happens when you think you’re the “good” one in a relationship, but out of nowhere the other person becomes far “gooder” than you? How do you deal with it?

    It’s also a book written by a man with a female narrator, something I can’t remember encountering. It seemed like she had a perfectly logical inner monologue, which probably means it’s somehow flawed in reality. But I digress.

    Katie’s husband David visits a healer and comes back completely changed. He’s nice to everyone, is concerned about the struggling people in the world and has suddenly utterly confused his wife who thinks he’s a jerk. Actually, as a doctor, she thinks there’s something very wrong with him. “David. I don’t want you to panic, but listen carefully and do exactly what I say. You probably have a brain tumor. You have to go to the hospital and have a CAT scan, urgently.”

    Of course there’s a far better explanation. He had crippling back pain, and visited a healer named GoodNews. That’s totally what I would do in case of major pain. Maybe my guy would be named Admiral GoodNews for extra authority.

    GoodNews does such a great job at not only healing the pain, but changing David’s sour outlook on life, he naturally moves in with the family. Told from Katie’s perspective, this is a totally non-sensical event and she’s less than enthused about a “healer” living under the same roof as her two children.

    But the way the story develops, you can feel right along with Katie how more normalized having a guy named GoodNews upstairs feels as things go along. She even agrees to let the eccentric man babysit the kids, though hopes she doesn’t know how she would explain the situation to a few parties who would never understand. “Imaginary conversation with my parents, or social services: ‘Who’s in charge of your children?’ ‘Oh, GoodNews and Monkey.'”

    Monkey, of course, is the homeless young man they’ve also invited to live with them as part of a program to get the entire block to “adopt” bums from the street. Hey if a guy named GoodNews is already in your home, what’s the worst that can happen, especially if it’s his idea?

    Katie’s problem of dealing with borderline nauseating “goodness” from her husband is exacerbated by her daughter, Molly. The girl likes to stick it to her brother whenever possible and takes on her own campaign of supporting everything David does. At one point Katie decides she pretty much despises her kids, especially Molly. I can’t blame her. That girl is one of the more annoying literary characters I’ve encountered in a while, and she’s not even mentioned that often.

    Be good.

    Next up: Paul Auster’s “The Book Of Illusions”

    November 14, 2008 books Uncategorized
  • Dog Days

    John Steinbeck is a MILF. That’s Man of Impeccable Literary Fantasticness; get your head out of the gutter. He’s also a guy with an ability to predict the future.

    In 1962 Steinbeck embarked on a trip across the country to reconnect with a place he wrote about, but felt he may have lost touch. Along for the ride went his poodle, Charlie as they rode in a specially designed truck/camper dealio Steinbeck ordered specifically for the journey.

    Late in the book, the duo is traveling through Texas when Steinbeck writes about the residents therein. “Outside their state I think Texas are a little frightened and very tender in their feelings, and these qualities cause boasting, arrogance, and noisy complacency.” Sound like someone who’s been out of Texas for, say, almost eight years?

    The book is called “Travels With Charley: In Search Of America” and is very much about the beloved Charley. Just like Steinbeck, Charley isn’t exactly a spry kitten anymore, not just for the fact that he’s a dog. But their relationship is an interesting one to follow as they traverse the U.S., making a loop west from New York.

    Steinbeck has very clear ideas of what he wants from the journey and sometimes struggles when his vision doesn’t pan out. Across the Midwest and the Northern Plains he describes Charley’s routine of “leaving his mark” on trees as they stop for a break. When they get to California, Steinbeck is almost giddy to have Charley christen a giant redwood. Charley didn’t quite get the memo:

    “‘Look, Charley. It’s the tree of all trees. It’s the end of the quest.’ Charley got a sneezing fit, as all dogs do when the nose is elevated too high. I felt the rage and hatred one has toward non-appreciators, toward those who though ignorance destroy a treasured plan.”

    But Steinbeck doesn’t just give up. He decides he has to know if Charley isn’t prepared for the task, or just doesn’t get the plan. So his owner cuts a sapling and “plants” it next to the giant tree. “He sniffed its new-cut leaves delicately and then, after turning this way and that to get range and trajectory, he fired.”

    Dogs: Spoiling humans’ best-laid plans for (insert number of years since dogs have been domesticated, a number I don’t feel like looking up).

    Of course, maybe it’s not entirely Charley’s fault. As Steinbeck describes, there’s a bit of a language barrier. “[Charley] was born in Bercy on the outskirts of Paris and trained in France, and while he knows a little poodle-English, he responds quickly only to commands in French.” Maybe “this tree is for your bladder-emptying needs” is not a phrase Steinbeck found in a translation book.

    When I read this book I didn’t realize just how integral Charley is to Steinbeck’s log of their travels. But after looking back at the sections I marked, nearly all of them are Charley related, and many were just things that made me laugh.

    The best Charley paragraph is easily this: “Charley is a tall dog. As he sat in the seat beside me, his head was almost as high as mine. He put his nose close to my ear and said ‘Ftt.’ He is the only dog I ever knew who could pronounce the consonant F.”

    Then there are just the wonderfull sign-of-the-times observations that go almost unnoticed in the middle of Steinbeck’s writing. While lamenting on the challenges and different nature of the South, he says he is dreading experiencing the region firsthand. “I am not draw to pain and violence. I never gaze at accidents unless I can help, or attend street fights for kicks.”

    Were there that many “street fights” going on in the early 1960s? Maybe New York is a particularly tough town, but it’s hard to imagine a place where one of the giants of American literature was learning about a fight in the street such that he would make a decision to attend or not. But maybe the fact that this reference is thrown in the middle of a paragraph in the middle of a much larger discussion about the plight of the South at the time shows just how much of a non-issue that was at the time. Certainly in comparison, but one of those things that caught my eye and made me reach up and dog-ear the page.

    By the way, if you’re counting at home this makes 14 books for the year. That’s definitely behind pace to reach my goal of 20, but I’m still holding out hope. Number 15–Nick Horny’s “How To Be Good”–should be done in a day or two…I hope.

    November 13, 2008 books Uncategorized
  • Remembered in Print

    I know you’ve been clamoring for updates on The Year of Books or Year of Reading or whatever it is I dubbed my quest to read 20 books this year. Well sometimes life gets in the way of your best intentions. That is not to say I gave up, but rather didn’t have a chance to chronicle the latest ones. Between seemingly simultaneous trips, ending an old job, looking for a new job, packing and moving, this space has been neglected, but I have been reading!

    So here goes.

    I’m still not sure what to make of the timing of this one. A lot of times I’ll get 75 percent through a book and put off the end for a few days. With “The Dead Beat” by Marilyn Johnson, those few days changed the tone with which I read.

    In the simplest description, it’s a book about obituaries. Most people my age don’t pay much attention to the often last chronicles of peoples lives printed in their local paper. But if you have taken journalism classes you probably had to delve into the world of writing about the dead.

    That process can be a fascinating way to learn incredible things about seemingly “normal” people. Or if your professor allows, you can decide the obit being written about you for class can include details of dying after being kicked in the chest by a kangaroo during a boxing match at Madison Square Garden. I’m sure I have always been a treat to have in class.

    Johnson doesn’t have to make up the absurd to delve into the art of the obit. She goes through the American and British papers who truly have turned this type of story into something to be studied. She even spends time at a convention of obit writers and readers who come together each year to discuss the craft and the latest in the world of last writings. During her discussion of playwright Arthur Miller’s obit, I learned he was the father-in-law of actor Daniel Day-Lewis.

    She does a great job of setting up the “debate” in the obit world, the decision of who gets that honored spot each day and how the story is written. Johnson breaks down the stylistic differences between those who stick to the easy details and those who pull no punches in lampooning characters who quite frankly deserve it.

    But perhaps the most poignant part of the book comes as she talks to one of the pioneers in modern U.S. obits. His name is Jim Nicholson, and he wrote for the Philadelphia Daily News. At the time of their interactions Nicholson had retired and was caring for his wife who had Alzheimer’s. He talks about getting out of a formulaic approach to the process, especially when talking to the family about their lost loved one:

    “Everyone who comes in the house or calls on the phone is trying their best to out-mourn everyone else. You get a steady diet of that for three or four days, and I call up and talk regular, just like I’m talking to you, it’s a breath of fresh air. I ask about his favorite breakfast food, what kind of disciplinarian was she, did she let you have that hamster or doge the first time you asked. I’d wind up asking the questions that people who live with you all your life never end up asking.”

    Unfortunately you can’t really time when that subject is going to come up. Sometimes you have an idea that the end may be near, but even then the final seconds are always a surprise. I mentioned before the few days I took off before finishing this book. I went to North Carolina for a camping trip with my brothers and some of my brother’s friends. That Saturday we got a call that our grandfather had died.

    And so it was a week of making arrangements to fly home, spend time with a family that seemingly “just” did this process three years ago with our grandmother. I don’t know if it was more comforting that we knew the routine–same funeral home, same cemetery, same pastor. But I do remember feeling like I was in a movie when we arrived at the burial to see a military honor guard and the ceremony that came with it–three-shot volley, presentation of the flag from the casket to my aunt, salutes as the procession arrived.

    I left work and went straight to the airport to fly home. While waiting for my flight in Jacksonville I read “He left many things well begun,” a line Johnson quotes from an obit in her collection. I’m not sure I would have read that line the same way had I finished the book a few days before.

    From the Loudoun Times-Mirror, Col. Chester W. McDowell, Jr.

    November 6, 2008 books family Poppop Uncategorized
1 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 86
Archives