Blog

  • High Fidelity

    Sometimes life is all about timing.

    Last week I finished Nick Hornby’s “High Fidelity,” which at another point in my life I think I would have really enjoyed. But for some reason I had a really hard time connecting with it in a positive way. It doesn’t have anything to do with Hornby since I’ve read and enjoyed several of his other books, but rather with how some of the elements relate to things that are going on right now.

    One of the major issues is the attitude of the main character, who runs a record shop and uses the story of several past loves as a lens to explain his latest relationship issues. His attitude is awful — brooding, negative, excessively sarcastic — and one that mirrors the kind of thing I’ve been working very hard lately to eliminate from the main character in my own writing project. (Yes, I’m still writing. Maybe I’ll update soon, but it’s been rather challenging in the past month or two.)

    Given that he owns a record store, it’s not surprising that music plays a big role in the story. There are musicians, endless top-5 lists of artists, albums and songs, and lots of talk about how certain songs can be closely tied to something in your memory:

    “Sentimental music has this great way of taking you back somewhere at the same time that it takes you forwards, so you feel nostalgic and hopeful all at the same time.”

    We all have those. If you’ve listened to a piece of music at any point in your life, it’s impossible to not have a few notes or a chorus bring someone or something rushing back to your mind no matter how far your brain has to reach. Sometimes that sentimentality is a good thing that elicits strong, positive emotions, but just as easily those songs can leave you shaking your head.

    Books can do that too. Another thing that I think skewed my experience with this book was the name of one of the recurring characters. Seeing it over and over again rang notes that brought me back to a situation I once had such fond memories of, but which has since been tainted by a flood of negativity. It’s hard to change those associations.

    This was also one of those books that somehow ended up with a lot of dog-eared pages by the time I finished, but looking back at those pages I have no idea why I marked them. I should really start taking notes as I read. I’ll end with one that doesn’t really need any explanation:

    “I can see everything once it’s already happened — I’m very good at the past. It’s the present I can’t understand.”

    September 2, 2011 books Uncategorized
  • Hits Keep Coming

    This may come as a great shock, but as a child I was a bit of a goofball.



    That’s me at baseball practice at the age of 10. It’s from a tape I found recently that my coach had made of each of us hitting. I imagine nowadays it would be some slickly produced highlight video with a pulsing soundtrack, but back then it was cool to be able to watch ourselves play.

    My brother I went to some batting cages yesterday to take some swings and see if we could actually still hit long after the glory days of our baseball-playing years. I brought along a camera, and it was interesting to see how things haven’t changed much. Sure, I’m stronger, have a little more swagger in my stance and definitely look better in HD, but all those swings as a 10-year-old certainly laid the foundation.

    A little from then and now:






    The old video also showed that my penchant for neatness is nothing new. I had forgotten about my habit of cleaning off home plate whenever it was my turn during batting practice:



    Someone had to do it, right?

    August 27, 2011 baseball Uncategorized video
  • Outliers

    The notion of the American Dream is that anyone can work hard and be successful, and that those who achieve great things got to where they are through their dedication, brilliance and effort.

    In “Outliers” author Malcolm Gladwell says those things are all well and good, but if you look hard enough there are almost arbitrary advantages that make a huge difference in who rises to the top.

    “It makes a difference where and when we grew up,” Gladwell writes. “The culture we belong to and the legacies passed down by our forebears shape the patterns of our achievement in ways we cannot begin to imagine.”

    I heard about this book long before I read it, specifically the example of elite hockey players. Gladwell says that if you look at any collection of people from this group, you’ll see that 40 percent of them were born in January, February and March. That compares to just 30 percent for July through December.

    Why? It has to do with a seemingly innocuous decision — the date that youth leagues use as a cutoff to decide how old you are for that season. They say however old you are on January 1, that’s your age. So kids with January 2 birthdays end up being almost a year older than kids in the same league who were born December 31. That matters. They’re bigger, they’ve probably been playing longer, so they seem a little better. They end up being picked for all-star teams, which play more games and practice more, thus turning any small advantage in skill into a huge one, all because of that date.

    I was a huge beneficiary of this growing up. I played baseball, and in our league the cutoff date was July 31. My birthday is August 3, so I was always one of the older kids. Gladwell says if you look at professional baseball players, more of them are born in August than any other month. Not sure where I went wrong.

    But if you’re not that interested in sports, he says “these exact same biases also show up in areas of much more consequence, like education.” Parents have to decide when to start their kids in school, which makes a big difference given the group they progress with. Here, I was on the opposite side of things, always one of the youngest people in my class. I was in the same grade as roommates CA and MR as we went through school, but both of them are almost a year older than I am. Sure, everyone could drive before I could, but that didn’t mean I couldn’t do better than them on a test.

    As part of a larger point, Gladwell brought up something about IQ that I thought was one of the more interesting notes in the whole book. He writes that experts say after a certain point, having a higher IQ makes no real-world difference. There are thresholds at which you are considered to have the mental capacity to pass high school or get through college, but he says someone with an IQ of 130 is no more likely to win a Nobel Prize than someone whose IQ is 180. He compares it to basketball players — if you’re 5-foot-5 there’s little chance you’re going to play in the NBA. But being 6-4 versus being 6-6 isn’t as big of a deal — you just have to be “tall enough.”

    Being 6-3 did not help my basketball career, though if any NBA teams are reading, I am still a free agent.

    Among other people, Gladwell writes about Bill Gates and how going to a certain high school that happened to have a really advanced computer, and then living near a college with a computer lab he could go to in the middle of the night were small advantages that led to his incredible success. These examples are interesting and make you think about how those little things add up. But Gladwell also takes moments here and there to give a more practical view of why we should pay attention to these things:

    “Our world only allowed one thirteen-year-old unlimited access to a time-sharing terminal in 1968. If a million teenagers had been given the same opportunity, how many more Microsofts would we have today? To build a better world we need to replace the patchwork of lucky breaks and arbitrary advantages that today determine success — the fortunate birth dates and the happy accidents of history — with a society that provides opportunities for all.”

    Amen.

  • National(s) Pastime

    The Philadelphia Phillies decided to lose a few games in Washington over the weekend, and for some reason thousands of their fans decided to make the trip to see the beatdown in person.

    This has become a trend whenever the Phillies are in town, with their fans occupying a huge portion of the stadium. As per the stereotypical reputation for Philly fans, they do a lot of booing, mainly of the Nationals, even during super classy times like when the team was being introduced during a pregame ceremony on Opening Day last year.

    I went to the game on Saturday with my brother, Pat, and we were able to witness a rare moment in sports — both fan bases booing the same player. If you aren’t familiar with either team, Washington right field Jayson Werth used to play in Philly and this year has been terrible for the Nats:

    The great thing about hearing the Philly fans boo is that Werth did nothing but a favor to them. He signed a big contract as a free agent, doing zero harm to the Phillies, and given his performance this year I’m not sure what exactly they are mad about.

    There’s an old anecdote about Philly fans booing anyone, even Santa Claus. Well, after Saturday you can add George Washington to the list:

    Sure, some of those boos were from Nats fans who wanted Teddy Roosevelt to get his first ever win, but given the number of Phillies fans in attendance it had to be mostly them.

    Another thing I don’t understand about that fan base is their desire to grab the Nationals-related promotional items. Last year I saw thousands of Phillies fans pick up their free Nats hats on Opening Day. On Saturday, the first 15,000 fans got an Ian Desmond bobblehead. That’s Ian Desmond, shortstop for the Nats. I don’t think I saw a single Washington fan with a bobblehead — just those from Philly.

    I know if I went up to see a game at Philadelphia’s Citizens Bank Park and it was Shane Victorino bobblehead day, I certainly wouldn’t take one. Why would I possibly want it?

    Just more proof that Philadelphia, and its fans, are crazy.

    August 22, 2011 baseball Uncategorized
  • Major Wisdom

    You meet someone for the first time. They’re attractive, nice to everyone around them, have a really engaging personality, and seem like they could succeed at absolutely anything they try. In a word, they’re perfect.

    You set this person up on a mantle, an object of envy, someone you wish you could be like. They have it all together in ways you don’t feel like you do.

    But as you get to know them more, you see the cracks, those little flaws that bring them down from that cloud of seeming perfection. And yet, you find that as you see more of those nuances the person seems even better than you initially thought. There’s a more colorful story there, one that shoots through the highs and lows of life instead of cruising along at a constant one-note level.

    As a character in Helen Simonson’s “Major Pettigrew’s Last Stand” puts it, “Everyone needs a few flaws to make them real.”

    The story follows Major Pettigrew, a retired British army officer who lives in a small town characterized by proper social structures and country club attitude. The Major at once embraces the old set as a defense of traditional British ways against modern excess while also bristling at the lack of progress in cultural acceptance.

    The Major strikes up a friendship with a Pakistani woman who runs a sort of convenience store in town, a relationship that brings out more than a few off-handed less-than-enlightened comments from his friends and country club colleagues. As they connect into a deeper and deeper friendship, the Major (a widower) and Mrs. Ali (a widow) find an unexpected renewal of the types of feelings they thought had long ago left their lives for good.

    But life isn’t perfect, and when circumstances surrounding Mrs. Ali’s family force her to leave town, the Major is left to discuss the disappointment with a neighbor who pushes him to reach out to her and make sure she knows how he feels:

    “You miss her,” she said. “You are not happy.”

    “It is a moot point,” he said. “She made her choice very clear. One feels quite powerless.”

    Whether it’s a slow realization or an overt rejection, this is one of the worst feelings we can experience. You care for someone who decides they don’t want you as that part of their life. They make a choice and you can’t help but feel powerless as they leave you wondering what it is about you that makes it so easy for them to say “no thanks.”

    But sometimes we can save ourselves from that fate, or protect ourselves from that disappointment, if only we pay attention to the subtle and not-so-subtle signs, no matter at what stage a relationship may be. The Major, comforting his son who just had a fight with his girlfriend, offers some wisdom that a girl — or two, or 283 — in my past could identify with:

    “You are not the first man to miss a woman’s more subtle communication,” he said. “They think they are waving when we see only the calm sea, and pretty soon everybody drowns.”

    It’s really a sweet story about the Major and Mrs. Ali, the Major and his son, Mrs. Ali’s family, and how all of them interact in a community of differing goals, standards and ideas of how the world should work.

    I’ll end with one of the Major’s many nuggets of wisdom: “But we, who can do anything, we refuse to live our dreams on the basis that they are not practical.”

    [Note: I realize this is the kind of post some people may read too much into. Don’t.]

    August 18, 2011 books Uncategorized
  • In Defense Of Snooki

    Let’s just get it out there — I love “Jersey Shore.”

    There. I said it. Judge if you must, but hear me out.

    For those who don’t know, “Jersey Shore” is a reality show on MTV that follows eight 20-somethings as they spend a summer living it up at, you guessed it, the Jersey Shore. Actually one of the seasons was shot in Miami and the current episodes were done in Italy, but whatever. Just go with it.

    The show has the normal things you would expect from any reality show, with enough debauchery, infighting, drunken wisdom and egoism to make even Charlie Sheen proud. There are certainly lots of people who think it may be the dumbest show on television, but those people are clearly ignoring the one — or many — shows on their DVR that are no better. Don’t pretend like you’re watching the National Geographic channel all day.

    My roommates and I realized last night while watching the show that it is pretty much the only one that all three of us watch. There are others that two of us keep up with, but “Jersey Shore” is sure to bring everyone into the living room at the same time.

    One of the things I love is that the majority of the time they refer to each other with nicknames — not ones that came organically from within this group, but rather were brought from home and tossed in as a part of their original introductions. “My friends call me Snooki.” Oh, OK, we’ll just call you that then.

    We all have nicknames for friends that we use once in a while, but those always have some sort of inside joke that makes sense within that relationship. I don’t introduce myself with the option of calling me Hotshoe, Heinous, Christafuh, Erty, Channas or Issypher, since those are only meaningful to certain people. I have no idea where Snooki came from, but it certainly wasn’t from the Shore house. For the non-watchers, the other names include JWoww, The Situation, Pauly D, and Sammi Sweatheart — though no one uses that last one because she’s not. At all.

    Another sign of a great show is the use of catchphrases, and “Jersey Shore” certainly doesn’t disappoint. When we get close to 10 on Thursday nights (when the show airs) you are guaranteed to hear shouts of “Cabs are heeere” and “Awww yeah, burgers for the boys” ringing through our house. I might even go to Twitter in the pre-show excitement:

    That’s all not to mention the now-ubiquitous terms GTL, smush, and grenade that sprang from the show.

    But really the main draw of the Jersey Shore comes down to the fact that it features one of my favorite things in the world — drama that doesn’t involve me.

    Oh and it inspired the name of my fantasy football team, which year after year brings lots of assets to the table but ultimately underperforms: CWoww.

    August 12, 2011 television Uncategorized
  • Watch and Learn

    I know after my stellar effort hosting a fake infomercial the world has been clamoring for more.

    Lucky for you there is another video in the same vein, this time with me hosting a series of important instructional videos. If you never figured out how to drive a nail with a hammer, read a digital clock or use a faucet, this is the video for you.

    It again features Dave, this time as my student, and our friend Justin does some camera work. You’ll notice a few rough edits throughout the video, which is mainly due to the fact that the entire thing is basically ad-libbed and we just couldn’t make it through without laughing. That will be really clear when you see the bonus blooper video afterward.

    Sit back and learn:









    Things may have gotten a little silly during the shoot. If I were an SNL cast member, people would definitely complain about my laughing during sketches:





    August 5, 2011 Uncategorized video
  • Ukraine is Strong

    Back in high school, my friend David and I used to borrow his parents’ video camera and make creative videos as a way to pass time, have fun and learn how to edit.

    Actually, “make” creative videos might not be as accurate as “thinking about making” creative videos. A lot of times we would be hanging out at his house and have the following conversation:

    Dave: “Dude, we should make a video.”
    Me: “Yeah, definitely.”
    Dave: “Do you have any ideas?”
    Me: “No, you?”
    Dave: “No.”
    Me: “Cool.”

    We would look around the room and flip through TV channels looking for inspiration, and sometimes, as in the case I’m about to show you, we could come up with a concept we thought we could actually pull off.

    This video I believe was done during our senior year of high school. I’m pretty sure about the high school part, and based on my car I walk by in the beginning and my seeming lack of braces, that timeline would fit. It would also make it one of the first videos we edited in Adobe Premiere, which has been used for the majority of what I’ve shared here.

    Without further ado:



    Don’t worry, mom. Unloaded BB gun.

  • PB&J Revisited

    It turns out that in the peanut butter and jelly world, I am part of a very select group of people who make sandwiches in a logical way.

    After my post last week, I got a lot of feedback that showed most of you do not agree with my method. The comments ranged from saying I’m un-American to my own mother questioning how she raised me. I really had no idea I was doing something so strange, always assuming everyone did it the same way. I guess we learn a lot by asking even simple questions.

    What I learned is that even though I may be different, I’m not alone. Shout-out to those who PB&J the right way — my coworker JA, sister-in-law Bethany, and my second-cousin Sara, whom I have never met but who has been awarded instant cool status.

    And for those who still question my method — especially those in my family — please consider this email I got from Grandpa Hannas: “P.S. PB&J – Gramma makes ’em like you do.”

    Who can argue with that?

    August 4, 2011 Uncategorized
  • Orange You Glad

    It’s funny which little comments people make to you over the years that stick with you and end up affecting things you do later on.

    This morning I unpacked a box of clothes I just bought — a process I absolutely cannot go through without thinking of my friend Aundrea. Her comments have played a role in pretty much every piece of clothing I have purchased since early 2006.

    We went to grad school together, and I walked into class one day wearing this shirt with orange stripes on the sleeves:

    Aundrea practically gave me a Nobel Prize in fashion for the dose of color, and used the opportunity to inform me that my wardrobe was extremely boring. She had a point. It’s not much of an exaggeration to say that 90 percent of my shirts at the time were either navy blue, grey, grey with navy blue, or navy blue with grey.

    For a while her influence was more direct in my mind. I would see a shirt I liked and think, “Ok, this the color I would get, but Aundrea would tell me to get that one.”

    I think I more routinely expand my horizons today, and can report that none of the shirts I just got are navy blue or grey. Now if only I could bring back the bright yellow shoes I used to have.

    July 29, 2011 Uncategorized
1 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 86
Archives